sachikomclean.com also does outcall

[Richard Hertz]

------------------------------------------
ADDED BY JEPPE (EDITOR):

To readers of this thread - just ignore the less serious parts of the debate - I have a hard time believing the initial story from Richard Hertz.

I had a hard time deciding whether or not to delete this thread, but I am not going to do it.

Firstly because I am greatly opposed to censorship, but also because there is at least some actual debate going on about the quality of the site, which others might find useful as well.

But let me say that Sachiko McLean's website is not a rip-off and neither leaves the impression of an exploited woman. In fact we like it as you can read here: http://www.adultreviews.net/review/show/10360/index.html

------------------------------------------
ORIGINAL POST BY RICHARD HERTZ:

I had occasion to visit the Gold Coast area of Brisbane recently. Outcall is legal in this part of Australia, as long as done by individuals (no "services"). I noticed an ad in the local paper for a Taiwanese/Japanese girl with measurements of 38/22/32, my special interest an Asian woman. I called, and was quoted $150 for full service including "full sex", and asked her to come over.

Turned out it was this same girl who has a pay website sachikomclean.com! She was perfunctory and businesslike, has a tremendous body, including really gigantic tits that she won't have touched. Likewise DATY was off the menu, and all in all very mechanical and uninteresting. Some guy (Mr. McLean no doubt) hung around this five star hotel waiting for her to turn over the cash.

I had seen her website before, and now understand the confusion expressed in the review here. Despite the great body, this broad is OLD (probably over 40) which is obvious in a few of the photos. And apparently the whole idea is her pimp boyfriend ideas, and the "photographer" of this woman. Look at the pictures closely and you'll see many of them have been taken in a low-rent junky apartment so common in this area. Doesn't even have the good sense to find a nice location.

I feel very sorry for this woman, who's clearly being just exploited. This is all clear now in the website.

[ljmac]

Over 40? Like Richard says, you can see just how old Sachiko is by checking out the many free photos on her site (and in the Backstage section here). When you do, you will see just how ridiculous this assertion is. (Sachiko is possibly the only model on the net who doesn't wear any makeup apart from lipstick in her photos, so what you see is what you get!)

As for not finding 'nice locations' for the photos, there's a reason why her site is the most highly rated Asian site here (the review makes a strong point of how beautiful the settings for the photos are). Therefore, given that you can see for yourself that these two statements are false, you can make your own judgement as to how accurate the rest of what Richard says is.

I also think it's pretty clear from her FAQ and Diary that Sachiko is far too intelligent and strong-willed to be exploited by anyone. That's why she decided to start her own independent web site, instead of taking the 'easy' route of selling herself to the modelling/entertainment companies. Indeed, if Richard really did feel 'sorry' for her, he obvioulsy wouldn't be posting this sort of thing in a public forum.

Regards,
Lee
Webmaster/Photographer SachikoMcLean.com

P.S. When you write something about some one on the internet, don't forget that you AREN'T anonymous, and you may be exposing yourself to legal action. That would mean everyone would know who you are (and in Richard's case, by his own admission, he has to pay to get laid).

[Izabella]

I don't believe your story Richard since the chance of something like that happening is almost impossible. I am not sure why you would bring it up anyhow. While she is not young, she is quite a hottie and has a great boobs job from what I can tell from the preview pictures...

[Richard Hertz]

Over 40? Like Richard says, you can see just how old Sachiko is by checking out the many free photos on her site (and in the Backstage section here). When you do, you will see just how ridiculous this assertion is. (Sachiko is possibly the only model on the net who doesn't wear any makeup apart from lipstick in her photos, so what you see is what you get!)

Regards,
Lee
Webmaster/Photographer SachikoMcLean.com
.

I note that you haven't denied that "Sachiko Mclean" is doing outcall from an ad in the Gold Coast Bulletin (which I've retained). I never said she doesn't look good. The giant fake breasts are worth the price of admission alone. If the website is so successful, why would she be doing this kind of "work"? The answers are self-evident.

[ljmac]

I'm not going to bother to try and deny something I can't prove one way or the other - that would be bringing myself down to your level. I simply ask that people check your claims for themselves and make up their own mind.

The fact that you've posted this same message in many places (under different names) and you say you've retained an ad from the local paper demonstrates that you are both dishonest and have an axe to grind. No doubt you are some loser who Sachiko rejected when you came on to her - and the fact that you openly admit you have to pay to get laid shows she's not the only one.

Lee

[Richard R. Hertz]

I don't believe your story Richard since the chance of something like that happening is almost impossible. I am not sure why you would bring it up anyhow. While she is not young, she is quite a hottie and has a great boobs job from what I can tell from the preview pictures...

Why would it be "impossible" that someone selling their naked pictures on the net would also be a hooker? I'm pleased to see that you agree that she's not at all "young", and we both agree that she's had a great plastic surgeon. Clearly without this extensive bagwork, she'd be unable to do either of these professions..

BTW you should know that working as a hooker is perfectly legal in Australia, as I would never have done anything illegal.

So much is made of "Sachiko" being some kind of singing and dancing talent that this nonsense needs to be debunked. After all, this site is "adult reviews" - for some reason "Sachiko's" boyfriend/webmaster/photographer/pimp feels it necessary to attack those posting a review. Perhaps "Lee" should consider getting a real job instead of living off the fruits of his girlfriend's flatbacking.

[ljmac]

After all, this site is "adult reviews" - for some reason "Sachiko's" boyfriend/webmaster/photographer/pimp feels it necessary to attack those posting a review.

But you have NOT posted a review of her site, merely the unsubstantiated personal attacks of some loser who can't get laid without having to pay for it, and is obviously jealous of Sachiko's partner - that is the only logical motivation for someone posting comments such as these in a public forum. Once again, Sachiko's site is the most highly rated Asian site here, and the reviews compliment her singing and dancing as well. And once again, Sachiko is far too strong-willed and independent to be 'pimped' by anyone - this is obvious to anyone who reads her diary and FAQ, or who exchanges email with her (or who actually has spoken to her).

Lee

[Izabella]

Richard:

What I meant is that the chances of meeeting someone who is a model and has a website are rather slim based on the amount of people in the world. Nevertheless, even if she provides escort services and you have met her, I am not sure what the big deal is? I have looked at the site again and I like its design and I would probably like the content. There are some things that are a bit off in my opinion and I do everything possible not to ever include them on my site. For example:

1. Another way we're unlike almost any other adult site on the net these days is that we're completely independent. That means the money you spend here goes straight to me and my webmaster/photographer to directly support this site. As we are so small, every one of our customers is important to us - you'll never be treated as 'just another member' here!
That certainly does not make this site special in any way. Many amateur sites, including mine, do the same. In fact, I purchase quite a bit of licensed content to provide extra stuff for my members and I do reply to all my e-mails. In fact I do even better since I do all the webmaster stuff myself...
2.Other adult sites may offer more 'content', but we emphasise quality and originality over sheer quantity.The quality of our JPEGs is much higher than most other sites
I also avoid such statements and instead offer proof by providing full size samples of what you would get if you join. Based on my limited knowledge of digital camera equipment the photos on the site are taken with a 3-6 megapixel camera. If you want to see quality in terms of size, resolution see MET-ART (they certainly can make the claim that they are the best)
3. Every single photo in our members' galleries is exclusive to this site. Unlike virtually every other model site on the net these days, we don't over-inflate the number of photos in our members' galleries by padding them out with trade pics from other models' sites!
I actually like this approach and although I feature over 200 models and their sites on mine it is a great idea and I can't say anything about it.

Overall, what I dislike is when certain models/sites claim that they are the best, most beautiful and so on just to sell the membership. "Best sex site in the world", "Best legs in US" and so on are slogans that are meaningless and often are very misleading once you join. I do like her site however as it is well organized, simple yet nice and offers quite a bit of previews of what you will get in the member area and there seems to be a variety of different scenes in the pictures. You must be angry about something Richard (I am not sure what) but I am certain that she models and does whatever else by her own choice not because she is forced to.

[GOLD COAST GUY]

I agree with Richard, this website is pretty worthless. Just pictures of this obviously aged anorexic asian woman with giant boobs stuck on like ornaments. She's clearly asexual, there are only so-called glamour shots and you never ever see this woman showing any sexual feeling at all. Mostly she looks pissed off in the photos.

And I've seen the ad Richard called. I'm not into paid sex, but you'd have to think twice to sign up for a website that just is a scam to pump money into her pimp's pocket.

Flame on!

[ljmac]

Come on "Richard", we all know "Gold Coast Guy" is just you posting under yet another name.

You might be more believable if you didn't keep saying things which people can see for themselves aren't true. For example, you say she looks pissed off in most of the photos, but actually she looks very bright and happy! Also, now you say you've seen her ad in the paper but you don't pay for sex. In that case, why are you looking in that section of the paper and how would you know the ad you claim you saw is her anyway?

If you want to lie about someone, you'd better not say anything which people can see for themselves isn't true. Or better yet, find a more productive way to vent your frustration over Sachiko (and other women) rejecting you. When you behave like this, is it any wonder no woman wants you? You really should seek therapy.

As for Lady Izabella's comments, we did say 'most', not 'every'. However, we've decided to change the wording a little with regard the independence comments, to 'the vast majority of', which I believe is factually correct.

As for whether this web site is worth it or not (or whether or not Sachiko is 'obviously aged'), just go there yourself and make up your own mind. If you want a second opinion, read the reviews, which were written by people who actually have seen our members' section (unlike "Richard").

Lee

[Jeppe]

To readers of this thread - just ignore the less serious part of the debate - I have a hard time believing the initial story from Richard Hertz.

I had a hard time deciding whether or not to delete this thread, but I am not going to do it.

Firstly because I am greatly opposed to censorship, but also because there is at least some actual debate going on about the quality of the site, which others might find useful as well.

But let me say that Sachiko McLean's website is not a rip-off and neither leaves the impression of an exploited woman. In fact we like it as you can read here: http://www.adultreviews.net/review/show/10360/index.html

[James Breen]

To readers of this thread - just ignore the less serious part of the debate - I have a hard time believing the initial story from Richard Hertz.

I had a hard time deciding whether or not to delete this thread, but I am not going to do it.

But let me say that Sachiko McLean's website is not a rip-off and neither leaves the impression of an exploited woman. In fact we like it as you can read here: http://www.adultreviews.net/review/show/10360/index.html

Have you been to Australia, Jeppe? This kind of escort work is very common and very above-board here. I've seen the ad in question as I live in the Brisbane area - I don't know if it's "Sachiko", but from the description in the ad it sure sounds like it.

I think you've already pointed out in your review issues that make it sound like she's being exploited. Your review says:

Fact is that Sachi makes approaches in several directions without truly finding or SHOWING her niche. Hence instead of getting the opportunity of going in-depth with either Sachi’s musical skills or her erotic performances one frankly gets stuck in the middle with a feeling of indifference

Your analysis of the shallowness of this website is right on. I just think Richard stumbled upon the cause. I don't think anyone wants to see any women exploited by others.

This babe has a great rack, I just wish there were a few photos where she actually smiles! That makes for a far more interesting website.

[ljmac]

This babe has a great rack, I just wish there were a few photos where she actually smiles! That makes for a far more interesting website.

I can't believe "Richard" is trying yet again under yet another name! Check out her photos - she smiles in practically all of them!

While I never understood the criticism mentioned in this review (Sachiko can't help it if she's multi-talented and wants to show all the things she does on her site!), it certainly doesn't indicate any 'shallowness'. And only a truly desperate man could draw the conclusion that she's being exploited from this!

Lee

[Jeppe]

OK thread closed, nothing more constructive seems to be contributed...